Jespernr

Medlemmer
  • Content count

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jespernr

  • Rank
    Medlem
  • Birthday 12/01/1974

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://

Profile Information

  • Sted
    Høve
  • Interesser
    Styrketræning, løb, svømning og havkajak. Er igang med uddannelsen til Skovhugger! <br />

Previous Fields

  • Træningsformål:
    Styrke og kondition
  1. Det ultimative træningsprogram!

    TJ: Jeg kan bare smide et tilfældigt spørgsmål ud til folkemængden...."Hvor mange world class vægttræningsatleter træner 10 minutter hver 14. dag". Hvad med Mike Mentzer Er det rent fup eller hvad? Jeg ved godt at det er BB og ikke SL men anyway, det er sgu da på et højt niveau! Jespernr
  2. Dr. Fuhrman, M.D.

    Det giver jeg dig helt ret i, og jeg tror hvis jeg skal være helt ærlig at han bare er blevet grebet af griskhedens stygge arm. Men ikke desto mindre så er hans bøger meget veldokumenteret og han virker som om han har noget at have det i! Jeg tror desværre at markedet i USA er så råddent at hvis man vil leve af det som han gør skal det foregå med disse sensationsprægede overskrifter og udsagn. Det ville aldrig gå i Danmark og jeg forholder mig også kun til det han skriver i sine bøger og i sine artikler som værende noget han har skrevet. Jeg tror simpelthen at hjemmesiden og hans lille geshæft bliver styret med hård hånd af en pengemaskine. Ang. det med kødet så siger han heller ikke at man skal blive 100% veganer, han siger bare at kød og mejeriprodukter skal være en meget lile del af ens kost. Grønt. frugt, nødder, bær, frø og kerner skal være hoveddelen. Noget som jeg hæftede mig ved er også at han ikke siger man kal spise noget bestemt produkt som han tilfældigvis sælger, men at det bare handler om at give kroppen det den er beregnet til. Han fraråder at tælle kalorier da det handler om at spise fødevarer med en så høj densitet af "nutrients" i forhold til kalorier, dvs rå grønsager, frugt osv. Derfor er hans mål ikke at sælge et produkt og blive rig på det men at oplyse/uddanne folk som er interesseret. Men igen så indrømmer jeg at stuntet med at henvise til hans hjemmeside ikke var det klogeste træk da den giver et helt forskruet billede af hans bøger og hans foredrag! hygge
  3. Dr. Fuhrman, M.D.

    Lidt mere derfra! A few studies on high cruciferous vegetables intake and their impact in arresting spread of cancer. Rose P, Huang Q, Ong CN, Whiteman M. Broccoli and watercress suppress matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity and invasiveness of human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005 Jun 10; pS0041-008X A high dietary intake of cruciferous vegetables has been associated with a reduction in numerous human pathologies particularly cancer. In the current study, we examined the inhibitory effects of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) and watercress (Rorripa nasturtium aquaticum) extracts on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)-induced cancer cell invasion and matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity using human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Aberrant overexpression of matrix metalloproteinases, including metalloproteinase-9, is associated with increased invasive potential in cancer cell lines. Our results demonstrate that extracts of broccoli and Rorripa suppressed TPA-induced MMP-9 activity and invasiveness in a concentration dependant manner as determined by zymographic analysis. Furthermore, fractionation of individual extracts followed by liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis (LC-MS) revealed that the inhibitory effects of each vegetable were associated with the presence of 4-methysulfinylbutyl (sulforaphane) and 7-methylsulphinylheptyl isothiocyanates. Taken together, our data indicate that isothiocyanates derived form broccoli and Rorripa inhibit metalloproteinase 9 activities and also suppress the invasive potential of human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in vitro. The inhibitory effects observed in the current study may contribute to the suppression of carcinogenesis by diets high in cruciferous vegetables. Johnston N. Sulforaphane halts breast cancer cell growth. Drug Discov Today 2004 Nov 1;9(21):908. Sulforaphane is a chemical found in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, sprouts and kale. This compound is a potent inducer of protective enzymes that provide defense against cancer-causing chemicals. Researchers have discovered that sulforaphane can halt human breast cancer cells in their tracks and have identified a new mechanism of action for the compound. Srivastava SK, Xiao D, Lew KL, et al. Allyl isothiocyanate, a constituent of cruciferous vegetables, inhibits growth of PC-3 human prostate cancer xenografts in vivo. Carcinogenesis 2003 Oct;24(10):1665-1670. We have shown previously that allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), a constituent of cruciferous vegetables, significantly inhibits survival of PC-3 and LNCaP human prostate cancer cells in culture, whereas proliferation of a normal prostate epithelial cell line is minimally affected by AITC even at concentrations that are highly cytotoxic to the prostate cancer cells. The present studies were designed to test the hypothesis that AITC administration may retard growth of human prostate cancer xenografts in vivo. Bolus i.p. injection of 10 micromol AITC, three times per week (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) beginning the day of tumor cell implantation, significantly inhibited the growth of PC-3 xenograft (P < 0.05 by two-way ANOVA). For example, 26 days after tumor cell implantation, the average tumor volume in control mice (1025 +/- 205 mm3) was approximately 1.7-fold higher compared with AITC-treated mice. Histological analysis of tumors excised at the termination of the experiment revealed a statistically significant increase in number of apoptotic bodies with a concomitant decrease in cells undergoing mitosis in the tumors of AITC-treated mice compared with that of control mice. Western blot analysis indicated an approximately 70% reduction in the levels of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in the tumor lysate of AITC-treated mice compared with that of control mice. Moreover, the tumors from AITC-treated mice, but not control mice, exhibited cleavage of BID, which is known to promote apoptosis. Statistically significant reduction in the expression of several proteins that regulate G2/M progression, including cyclin B1, cell division cycle (Cdc)25B and Cdc25C (44, 45 and 90% reduction, respectively, compared with control), was also observed in the tumors of AITC-treated mice relative to control tumors. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that AITC administration inhibits growth of PC-3 xenografts in vivo by inducing apoptosis and reducing mitotic activity. Finley JW. The antioxidant responsive element (ARE) may explain the protective effects of cruciferous vegetables on cancer. Nutr Rev 2003 Jul;61(7):250-254. Research supports the hypothesis that one's diet has a great impact on his or her risk of cancer. Many studies have found that increased fruit and vegetable intake decreases the risk of cancer. Cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli and cauliflower seem to be especially protective against cancer. Most studies show that phytochemicals in crucifers up-regulate many detoxification enzyme systems in the animal that consumes them. Recent reports of the molecular events involved in the activation of a gene promoter called the antioxidant responsive element have begun to provide clues as to how a single substance may induce a battery of many genes. Seow A, Yuan JM, Sun CL, et al. Dietary isothiocyanates, glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Carcinogenesis 2002 Dec;23(12):2055-2061. Dietary intake of cruciferous vegetables (Brassica spp.) has been inversely related to colorectal cancer risk, and this has been attributed to their high content of glucosinolate degradation products such as isothiocyanates (ITCs). These compounds act as anticarcinogens by inducing phase II conjugating enzymes, in particular glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). These enzymes also metabolize ITCs, such that the protective effect of cruciferous vegetables may predicate on GST genotype. The Singapore Chinese Health Study is a prospective investigation among 63 257 middle-aged men and women, who were enrolled between April 1993 and December 1998. In this nested case-control analysis, we compared 213 incident cases of colorectal cancer with 1194 controls. Information on dietary ITC intake from cruciferous vegetables, collected at recruitment via a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, was combined with GSTM1, T1 and P1 genotype from peripheral blood lymphocytes or buccal mucosa. When categorized into high (greater than median) and low (less than/equal to median) intake, dietary ITC was slightly lower in cases than controls but the difference was not significant [odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-1.12]. There were no overall associations between GSTM1, T1 or P1 genotypes and colorectal cancer risk. However, among individuals with both GSTM1 and T1 null genotypes, we observed a 57% reduction in risk among high versus low consumers of ITC (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.96), in particular for colon cancer (OR 0.31, 0.12-0.84). Our results are compatible with the hypothesis that ITCs from cruciferous vegetables modify risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with low GST activity. Further, this gene-diet interaction may be important in studies evaluating the effect of risk-enhancing compounds in the colorectum.
  4. Dr. Fuhrman, M.D.

    Her er lidt om det med brystkræften! Det er undersøgelser som disse der ligger til grund for hans argumenter omkring fødeindtaget contra kræft "A few epidemiological studies on diet and cancer prevention Shannon J, Ray R, Wu C, Nelson Z. Food and botanical groupings and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in Shanghai, China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005 Jan;14(1):81-90. Breast cancer incidence rates more than double in Chinese women as they migrate from China to Hong Kong to the United States, suggesting that environmental factors contribute to the international variation in breast cancer incidence. Several dietary factors, which differ between the United States and the Chinese population, including intake of soy, meat, and fruits and vegetables, have been suggested to affect breast cancer risk. This report describes results from a case-control study of diet and risk of breast cancer nested in a randomized trial of breast self exam in Shanghai, China. Participating breast cancer cases (n = 378) and frequency age-matched controls (n = 1,070) completed a comprehensive food frequency questionnaire and a risk factor questionnaire. After adjustment for age, total energy intake, and total years of breast-feeding, women in the highest quartile of fruit and vegetable intake (> or =3.8 servings/d) were significantly less likely to have breast cancer (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.78) as compared with women in the lowest quartile of intake ( < or =2.3 servings/d). Egg consumption was also significantly inversely associated with risk of breast cancer (odds ratio for > or =6.0 eggs/wk versus < or =2.0 eggs/wk is 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.91). There was no difference in soy consumption between cases and controls. None of the associations with a single botanical family explained the strong inverse relationship between fruits and vegetables and breast cancer risk. These results provide additional evidence in support of the important role of fruits and vegetables in breast cancer prevention. Cho E, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, et al. Premenopausal fat intake and risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (United States), Jul 16 2003, 95(14) p1079-1085. BACKGROUND: International comparisons and case-control studies have suggested a positive relation between dietary fat intake and breast cancer risk, but prospective studies, most of them involving postmenopausal women, have not supported this association. We conducted a prospective analysis of the relation between dietary fat intake and breast cancer risk among premenopausal women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study II. METHODS: Dietary fat intake and breast cancer risk were assessed among 90 655 premenopausal women aged 26 to 46 years in 1991. Fat intake was assessed with a food-frequency questionnaire at baseline in 1991 and again in 1995. Breast cancers were self-reported and confirmed by review of pathology reports. Multivariable relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: During 8 years of follow-up, 714 women developed incident invasive breast cancer. Relative to women in the lowest quintile of fat intake, women in the highest quintile of intake had a slight increased risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.59; P(trend) =.06). The increase was associated with intake of animal fat but not vegetable fat; RRs for the increasing quintiles of animal fat intake were 1.00 (referent), 1.28, 1.37, 1.54, and 1.33 (95% CI = 1.02 to 1.73; P(trend) =.002). Intakes of both saturated and monounsaturated fat were related to modestly elevated breast cancer risk. Among food groups contributing to animal fat, red meat and high-fat dairy foods were each associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Intake of animal fat, mainly from red meat and high-fat dairy foods, during premenopausal years is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996 Oct;96(10):1027-1039. In this review of the scientific literature on the relationship between vegetable and fruit consumption and risk of cancer, results from 206 human epidemiologic studies and 22 animal studies are summarized. The evidence for a protective effect of greater vegetable and fruit consumption is consistent for cancers of the stomach, esophagus, lung, oral cavity and pharynx, endometrium, pancreas, and colon. The types of vegetables or fruit that most often appear to be protective against cancer are raw vegetables, followed by allium vegetables, carrots, green vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, and tomatoes. Substances present in vegetables and fruit that may help protect against cancer, and their mechanisms, are also briefly reviewed; these include dithiolthiones, isothiocyanates, indole-3-carbinol, allium compounds, isoflavones, protease inhibitors, saponins, phytosterols, inositol hexaphosphate, vitamin C, D-limonene, lutein, folic acid, beta carotene, lycopene, selenium, vitamin E, flavonoids, and dietary fiber. Current US vegetable and fruit intake, which averages about 3.4 servings per day, is discussed, as are possible noncancer-related effects of increased vegetable and fruit consumption, including benefits against cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke, obesity, diverticulosis, and cataracts. Suggestions for dietitians to use in counseling persons toward increasing vegetable and fruit intake are presented." Ang. det med kødet så prøv at lægge mærke til hvem det er der har lavet kampagnen "Fisk 2-3 gange om ugen" ! Det er ikke sundhedsstyrelsen, det er fødevarestyrelsen. Hvorfor mon? Hygge
  5. Dr. Fuhrman, M.D.

    Jeg kan godt forstå din skepsis og ja hjemmesiden lugter langt væk af pengemaskine. Men min introduction til Dr. Fuhrman var gennem hans bøger. Disse handler ikke om vægttab og disse er meget veldokumenteret og videnskabligt funderet. Jeg synes du er lidt for hurtig til at klassificere ham som en af de andre pengegriske diæt skabere som Atkinson, blodtypediæter osv. Og nej man kan ikke helbrede kræft med en målrettet diæt men man kan undgå den og det er videnskabeligt bevist (henvisningerne kan jeg komme med hvis du ikke kender til dem). Rigtig mange undersøgelser bekræfter også at et øget kødindtag øger risikoen for kræft. Derudover er der i kød store mængder mættet fedt som ikke kan siges noget godt om. Og hvis argumentet er at man skal spise kød for at få en sikker kilde til de vigtige aminosyrer så holder den ikke. Ved et varieret indtag af grønsager kan man få tilsvarende aminosyrer i mængder der er meget mere skånsomme for organismen på lang sigt. Det faktum at vi ikke har ændret os genetisk mere end ca 0.1% de sidste 40.000 år iger også noget hvad vores krop er designet til at indtage af fødevarer. Og det er ikke raffinerede, industrielt fremstillede produkter. Men hvis du arbejder med folk der har problemer med kræft og andre sygdomme så ville det også være forkasteligt ikke at give dem muligheden for at prøve resultatet af et fødeindtag som er ernæringsmæssigt overlegent. Og det er det som han taler for ikke at man skal spise nogle bestemte produkter eller nogle bestemte fabrikater. Og jo hans hjemmeside er ikke særlig dansk hvor man helst ikke må sige at det man siger er rigtig uden at janteloven bliver presset ned over en. jesper
  6. Dr. Fuhrman, M.D.

    Jeg har nu i løbet af 6 uger tabt mig omkrng 8 kilo ved at følge den livsstil som Joel Fuhrman fortæller om i sine bøger og på sin hjemmeside www.drfuhrman.com. Det er meget simpelt og ikke hans ide men han fortæller om det på en måde som jeg ike før har set/hørt det beskrevet. Det handler om at spise sundt, udfra hvad forskningsresultaterne har bevist og det handler om at lade kroppen virke 100%. Prøv at se hvad han skriver og så lad mig hører hvad I kommer frem til? Jeg trænger til noget input from the other side!!! Hygge Jesper
  7. Hurtige kulhydrater efter træning

    Ja det var selvfølgelig også syltemøjet og nutella'en jeg refererede til, selvom at hvidt brød også indeholder store mængder sukker!
  8. Hurtige kulhydrater efter træning

    Det sukker der er i hvidt brød skal også omdannes før det kan blive til glucose så jeg har svært ved at se argumentet for at frugt skulle være dårligere! Det vi kalder sukker er jo saccarose! Tværtimod så er frugt hurtigere igennem systemet og dermed også hurtiger nede i tarmene hvor processen primært foregår. Det argument jeg kan se fornuften i er det med insulinniveauet som eksplodere ved indtagelse af saccarose (hvidt bordsukker/ raffineret sukker). Dog tror jeg ikke det har en heldig effekt på lang sigt! hygge jesper
  9. Kritik af mit kost- og træningsprogram ønskes =)

    Hvor lang tid bruger du på det program hver gang? Jeg ville ikke tage træk til nakke men til bryst istedet. Jeg vil ikke mene du behøver flere benøvelser! Faktisk synes jeg det virker som om du har mange øvelser der går i de samme muskler. Prøv at skrive dem op så de står i orden efter hvilke muskelgrupper de rammer (cirka!) Personligt ville jeg droppe nogle af de enkeltledsøvelser du har og så fokusere mere på multiledsøvelserne. Når man ser på din øvelsesmængde og den tid du har trænet så kunne jeg blive lidt nervøs for om du har startet for hårdt ud! Men det kommer jo helt an på intensiteten og din grundform før dette program. Mine svar er rodet det ved jeg men det var dine spørgsmål også Håber du kan bruge noget af det til noget. Men brug lidt tid herinde og se på folk indlæg og læs de artikler der er + se lidt på Getbig.dk under artikler. Der er specielt en artikel som jeg vil fremhæve! Fundamentprogram for begyndere, af Thomas Jagd. Lad dig ikke afvise af titlen "..for begyndere".. Du kan sagtens få meget ud af den. Hygge
  10. Så er det solgt! hygge Jesper :4thumbup:
  11. Men du skal få det til 4300,00 hvis du selv betaler fragten!
  12. Jeg aner det ikke! Har lige prøvet på nettet men uden resultat. Er der nogen som kender et firma der kan levere?
  13. Jeg er 190 cm og har ingen problemer. Og jeg ville mene at du også sagtens kan, men kom med en minimumshøjde for stangen så måler jeg efter! hygge
  14. Du kan få den for 2000,00 kroner men så går jeg heller ej lavere!
  15. Her er resten: Bænken OL-stang hygge