mig2009 Posted June 7, 2009 Report Share Posted June 7, 2009 Så det er måske ikke sundt at træne alligevel??http://www.bt.dk/article/20090606/sexogparforhold/90606010/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxPower Posted June 7, 2009 Report Share Posted June 7, 2009 Original artikel (kræver desværre konto/betaling)On average, men have 61% more muscle mass than women (d=3), a sex difference which is developmentally related to their much higher levels of testosterone. Potential benefits of greater male muscle mass include increased mating opportunities, while potential costs include increased dietary requirements and decreased immune function. Using data on males aged 18–59 years from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and including other relevant variables, fat-free mass (FFM) and/or limb muscle volume (LMV) are significant predictors of the numbers of total and past-year self-reported sex partners, as well as age at first intercourse. On the cost side, FFM and LMV are strong positive predictors of daily energy intake and strong negative predictors of C-reactive protein and white blood cell count, measures of native immunity.Uhada, ja man må hellere blive hjemme fra træning. Dog kunne det interessant at se hvor meget betydning det lavere immunforsvar har på sygdomsrate og død. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nips Posted June 7, 2009 Report Share Posted June 7, 2009 Oh well, muskler mindsker risikoen for kræft. Hvad vil du helst have, lidt forårsforkølelser eller kræft? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grundt Posted June 7, 2009 Report Share Posted June 7, 2009 Det er jo noget fis at stille det op sådan som BT. har gjort det! Hvor mange sygedage har en forholdsvis veltrænet mand ved siden af en junk-ædende storryger? Det er da noget fis at sige at en person der er mere veltrænet har dårligere imunforsvar. Som regel hænger den livsstil jo sammen med en fornuftig kost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lars L Andersen Posted June 7, 2009 Report Share Posted June 7, 2009 så vidt jeg husker ses C-reactive protein i forbindelse med inflammationstilstande i kroppen, så en negativ korrelation med muskelmasse favoriserer jo netop dem der er muskuløse ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blanco Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 så vidt jeg husker ses C-reactive protein i forbindelse med inflammationstilstande i kroppen, så en negativ korrelation med muskelmasse favoriserer jo netop dem der er muskuløse ...Så der er simpelthen bare tale om, at forskeren har misforstået sine egne resultater? Arhh, mon... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikaelLS Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Jeg burde nok læse originalartiklen, men mig bekendt er der ingen fordel ved at have kronisk forhøjet C-reaktivt protein, tværtimod. Det har man typisk hvis man har metabolsk syndrom, noget man ivhertfald ikke får hvis man lever sundt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Elvirus- Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Så der er simpelthen bare tale om, at forskeren har misforstået sine egne resultater? Arhh, mon...Nok nærmere journalisten (as usual) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homer555 Posted June 25, 2009 Report Share Posted June 25, 2009 (edited) Jeg burde nok læse originalartiklen, men mig bekendt er der ingen fordel ved at have kronisk forhøjet C-reaktivt protein, tværtimod. Det har man typisk hvis man har metabolsk syndrom, noget man ivhertfald ikke får hvis man lever sundt.Det er absolut ikke fordelagtigt at have kronisk forhøjet niveau af CRP: "Recent research suggests that patients with elevated basal levels of CRP are at an increased risk of diabetes,[9][10] hypertension and cardiovascular disease.""Some organs of the body show greater risk of cancer when they are chronically inflamed."Ved akut inflamation stiger CRP op til 50.000 fold. produceres i fedt væv. kunne jo tænkes at de kroniske niveauer som ses ved trænede individer skyldes at cellerne bliver mere effektive til at producere CRP ved en given inflamation, og de kroniske niveauer derfor kan holdes lavere, hvilket det tyder på skulle være en GOD ting.Jeg håber da ikke det medfører at folk stoppe med at træne pga. af denne fejlfortolkede forskning. Edited June 25, 2009 by homer555 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.