Mr.Freeze Posted November 18, 2003 Report Share Posted November 18, 2003 Don Frys?? :lol: Der er vist ikke meget Don over mig.Jeg er sikker på at Jørgen L har en masse gode ideer og din egen fys har nogle. Det er da vist osse blevet debatteret tidligere i din log ;) Det kan jo både være en slimsæk og et ledbånd på siden det kan være galt med. Måske skulle du prøve med et vippebrædt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoqRouge Posted November 18, 2003 Report Share Posted November 18, 2003 Coqrouge: Jeg tænkte, at hvis skoen ikke sad godt nok fast om hælen (min hæl er lidt for smal til skoen), så var den mere instabil?Det er også rigtigt - et rimeligt fit på skoen er en forudsætning for, at det for alvor giver mening at tale om effekten af specielle sko til korrektion af f.eks. overpronation. Hvis du har smalle hæle, kunne det være en idé at prøve et par Saucony - de har typisk en form med relativt bred forfod og relativt smal hæl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 19, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 Jeg har faktisk et par næsten ubrugte Saucony liggende (hvad jeg efterhånden ikke har liggende af mere eller mindre udtjente løbesko). De har en ret hård inderside på sålen (det grå materiale), så jeg ved ikke om det bliver for meget med mine indlægssåler med ekstra svangstøtte. Men jeg prøver at løbe lidt med dem, og mine gamle NB 1000 for at se, hvad anklen siger til det :) ...Idag: UV-rugby kamp 2x30 minutter. Vi var underbemandet, og havde kun en målmand med. Der skal være mindst 2, så valget stod mellem mig (som ikke vil gr. nakken) og en gut, hvis målmandsspil overhovedet ikke harmonerer med forsvaret. Jeg bøjede min sølle nakke, og jeg gør det aldrig igen <_< Det er overhovedet ikke sjovt at spille målmandsafløser mere, Nakkeholdet fra Helvede lurer hele tiden i baghovedet (i mere end een forstand)... Følingen med målet og afløseren var også langt væk.Vi tabte begge kampe (det var dog ikke min skyld helt alene, tror jeg ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 19, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 Idag:Skåne-DFHT Deloaduge 2/session C:Opvarmning: Hang snatch 4x5 x 25 kgDødløft: (1x10 x 60 kg); 3x5 x 85 kgPowercleans: 3x5 x 50 kgGoodmornings: 3x5 x 50 kgSkrå hyperextensions: 2x10Bulgarsk squat: 2x8 x 10 kgIncline reverse bench crunches: 2x8Twist crunch: 1x10/side.Lægtræning 2x10 x 20 kg - med vægt på eccentrisk del.Bulgarsk squat kan meget vel gå hen og blive min nye lår-buster i stedet for front squat (tak, sas :) ). Det bliver faktisk nemmere at holde balancen med en håndvægt i hver hånd. Hvis man ser bort fra den vægt, som balancebenet læsser af, svarer to 5-kg's håndvægte jo til, at man i alm. squat har egen kropsvægt på stangen (78 kg) + 20 kg = næsten 100 kg (I wish...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niske Posted November 19, 2003 Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 Hej AF :) ,Kan du evt. overtales til at lave en log.no.2, når du rammer side 100? Det er dælme svært at finde lige den ting man læste for et stykke tid siden, og til sidst ender jeg med begrebsforvirring .Niske Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 19, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 Hej Niske :) Jeg har overvejet at lave en ny log, men så skulle det være når der sker en naturlig ændring i min træning, som fx at jeg bliver skadesfri og kan begynde at træne efter bænkpreskonkurrencer eller hvad jeg nu vil igen (det er forhåbentlig snart).Der er nu også lidt nostalgi i at have en gammel log fra begyndelsen af min MOL-tid (eller fra dengang online logbog-forumet blev oprettet), så det er med lidt blandede følelser jeg ville lave en ny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Freeze Posted November 19, 2003 Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 Jeg synes ikke du har fået indsendt resultaterne til Uv-sport ;) Man følger jo lidt med i hvordan det går Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 19, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 Freeze: Hvilket resultat :confused2: (har allerede fortrængt kampene igår) - det har jeg iøvrigt folk til :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Freeze Posted November 19, 2003 Report Share Posted November 19, 2003 Ok ok, så det manglende resultat fra de kampe du ikke spillede igår Dine folk arbejder ikke så hurtigt.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 20, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2003 Idag:Skåne-DFHT Deloaduge 2/session B:Opvarmning: Hang snatch 4x5 x 25 kgDB bænkpres: (1x10 x 10 kg); 8-8-7 x 14 kgPush press: (1x5 x 30 kg); 3x3 x 37,5 kg - lidt bedre lockout i dag :) Assisted pullups, widegrip: 8-6 x -25Tri pushdown: 2x8 x 17,5 kgUnderhand chinups, 6 sek. negs: 3x3Cervical extensions: 2x15 x 16 kgBB bicepscurls: 2x5 x 31 kg; 1x15 x 21 kg (backoff).Det var sidste dag i DFHT runden :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 20, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2003 Igen idag:Løb - Run4fun begynderprogram 1, uge 3/dag 1 - slet ikke så meget ballade med anklen som sidst :confused2: :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TF vol. II Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henning Friis Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Hun er på ferie lige for tiden. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TF vol. II Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 nå - det ku´ jeg jo ikke vide. Jeg fandt den i støvet da jeg ledte efter min egen.XAX - du er li´godt kvæk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 29, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2003 Hej igen :) En summering af træningsloggen efter en uge på La Santa Sport:21.11: Squash 45 min22.11: FITBALL træning 1 timeLidt finnesvømningDeep water træning (vandaerobic) ½ timeBadminton 1 time23.11:Golf ½ timeSurfing 1 timeBadminton 45 minStep 1½ time24.11:Kajak ½ timeStyrketræning - Opvarmning: Hang snatch 4x5 x 25 kgBænkpres: (1x10 x 20 kg; 1x6 x 30 kg); 3x6 x 35-37,5-40 kg; 1x3 x 42,5 kg (failure)DB incline BP: 2x8 x 10 kg; 6-5 x 12 kg supersæt medDB incline flyers: 2x10 x 8 kg; 10-11 x 6 kgWidegrip pullups: 8 - (mindre assist) 6 - 5 repsYates rows: 3x8 x 40 kg (let)Upr. rows: 4x8 x 35 kgDB triceps ext: 8-6-5-5 x 5 kgBB bicepscurls: 6x8 x 24 kgConcentration curls: 2x10 x 8 kgVar vældig inspireret af vægtløftning på Eurosport, som kørte på centerets fjernsyn - følte mig dog lidt flimsy ved at snatche 25 kg i opvarmning, når tøserne med BW først i 60'erne snatchede over 100 kg - imponerende Surfing ½ time i ikke-begynder vind 25.11:Surfing 2½ time Bodybike ½ time26.11:Surfing 2 timer :sweetsun:Fitball instruktion 1 time27.11:Fitball træning 1 time - hvorefter vi fløj ind og øvede stående squat; det lykkedes mig faktisk uden vægt og på en blød bold B) Styrketræning - Opvarmning: Hang snatch 3x5 x 25 kgDødløft: (1x8 x 60 kg); 6x6 x 80 kgGoodmornings: 3x8 x 45 kgSwissball hyperextensions 2 sæt Surfing 1½ time- og så hjem fredag 28.11 :( :( En fed uge, hvor jeg især blev inspireret til VL og swissballtræning, samt surfing Jeg genovervejer i øjeblikket at kigge ned i VL Kono, som ligger lige om hjørnet. Ret praktisk :) Har jeg råd til begge dele, vil jeg dog stadig bevare medlemsskabet i OBBC, da Kono ikke har åbent formiddage og weekends Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henning Friis Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 Hey LouiseSquatfather skrev tidligere at der vist ikke var nogle rigtige vægtløftningstrænere tilbage i Kono. Vi har da en gammel vægtløfter i OBBC også, så ham kunne du evt. tale med, hvis du gerne vil have lidt teknisk bistand. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted November 30, 2003 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 Jeg skal have meget teknisk bistand (inden jeg brækker brystbenet på mig selv i cleans) Men jeg prøver lige at tage ned og kigge - skal jeg stille op til konkurrence i VL, så skal jeg jo være medlem dernede....Fredag og lørdag: Ingenting.Idag:Styrketræning - volumen overkrop og lidt powercleans:Opvarmning: Hang snatch 3x5 x 25 kg; 1x5 x 30 kgPowercleans: 2x3 x 40-45 kg; 4x3 x 50 kgBænkpres, 1 min pause: 6x6 x 30 kgMilitærpres, 1 min pause: 6x6 x 20 kgUH chinups 6 sek. negativer: 4-3-3BB Bentover rows: 3x6 x 50 kgPushups på swissball: 15-12-11Preacher curls (maskine): 4x10 x 15 kgLidt balanceøvelser på swissball (min nye dille ); Xax prøvede også til, og det bliver garanteret bedre næste gang :biggrin2:Efter styrketræning: Spinning 1 time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henning Friis Posted November 30, 2003 Report Share Posted November 30, 2003 Konkurrencevægtløfter, jamen jamen jamen... ;) Tager sig til sine kinder ganske som knægten i "Alene Hjemme" filmene... :lol: Ja ja, og så var jeg jo god underholdning i dag ;)Men jeg giver ikke så let op med de Swissballs. Eller gør jeg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted December 1, 2003 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Hæh, det er der såmænd ikke så meget i - hende som vandt DM i min vægtklasse, trak 40 kg :xmas: (jeg varmer op med 30). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsc Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Så skal du jo virkeligt til at squatte igen. Mindst 25% af din træning. Læs evt denne artikel af Louis Simmons om hvordan han mener VL BURDE træne:Article by Louie Simmons on how he would train the O-lifts, if anyone doesn't know he is the founder of Westside Barbell Powerlifting Club and the most successful Powerlifting trainer in the world, his methods on Powerlifting were revolutionary and extremely impressive. This is from MILO magazine. It's quite long, but worth the read as I found it interesting and controversial.In 1968 Jan Talts of the USSR said his training consisted of 90% power work and 10% actual competitive lifts. By doing this, he became one of the greatest lifters of all time. I recall him moving up to 110 kg. (actual weight roughly 100 kg.) and soundly defeating Bob Bednarski at the 1970 World Championships in Columbus, Ohio. If this system worked for him, why not me? Thus by using the training of the Soviets and modifying the special exercises to fit into powerlifting, I have developed the strongest power club in the world. In the United States, Olympic lifters have the Olympic Training Center, a national coach, and money in their budget. In fact, the Olympic lifter has everything that a powerlifter does not, yet the United States powerlifters rule the world, while our Olympic lifter brothers drag up the rear at international meets. I ask you, how can this be? Olympic lifters have a lot of excuses, none valid. This brings me to the title "What if" I trained Olympic Lifters? If I were an Olympic lifting coach, I would first teach how one should train. A major mistake is doing the two lifts too often. Good training requires variety. I have said before that everything works, but nothing works forever. The dynamic method with submaximal weight should be employed. This method is very effective with the correct percentages. I would recommend using weights between 60 and 80% of max to start with. A lifter who can clean 400 would start with 240 for the first week of training. The lifter would perform 12 cleans with short rest periods between sets (45 seconds to start with) and then 12 power snatches with the same percent and the same rest time between sets. If a lifter's best snatch is 330, the weight is 198. Jump 5% a week, and repeat 12 cleans and snatches at 65%. At 70% and 75% reduce the lifts to nine each. When you reach 80%, I recommend eight lifts each, for a total of 16. You are now employing the dynamic method with submaximal weight. You have also established a rest period. When using relatively light weights, short rest intervals are crucial. One should never let the body recuperate. If this happens, the athlete is doing nothing. Naturally, the lifter must use maximum force and always try to accelerate the bar. The lifts should only be done once time per week. Lifters in the United States spend too much time on the quick lifts. The reasons is twofold. First, the bar speed is too quick, for the most part. A weight can move too fast to develop max force. The weight selection is critical. As regards the velocity-force curve (a concept you should be familiar with), the bar should have a sufficient amount of weight to achieve the force factor and a certain amount of speed to supply the velocity. If you understand this, you may begin to see teh problem. The olympic lifter may move the bar so fast that force is neglected. Remember what I said about weight selection. Let me illustrate by talking about throwing an object with a certain arm speed. Arm movement represents your absolute strength. If I throw a whiffle ball, it won't go very far because it's too light for max force to exist. Now if I throw a shot put, it doesn't go very far either because it's too heavy; thus no velocity is developed. However, if I throw a baseball, it will go a great distance because I have found a balance between force and velocity. This balance is found by doing velocity work with the Olympic lifts, and force work with special exercises in a controlled method known as the conjugate method. Foreign lifters have said the U.S. lifters lack strength, and I see the same thing. But no one seems to have an answer. I do. To suceed at weight lifting, a number of things are required. First you must be very strong. This is where special exercises come in. If you think you must clean, for example, to be good at the clean, you are wrong, at least partly. I have seen a strong man clean 250 the first time he tried. How did he make that initial clean with no formal training? It was done through other physical activity. If he only concentrated on the clean, it is doubtful that he would ever double his effort to 500. However, if he used special exercises to develop the correct pulling muscles, he would have a much better chance. It is known that to become a better miler, one has to increase his ability to sprint as well as increase stamina to the point of performing more and more work by doing multiple sets of runs at specific distances. At the same time, the rest periods between runs must be shortened. Also special exercises must be done to advance his progress. This is true in weightlifting as well. The second reason why too much time on the quick lifts is that if a lifter cleans and snatches all the time, it can lead to overdevelopment in some major muscle groups, while neglecting others. I'm sure that if you line up five weightlifters in a row, you will find that some have better traps, while lacking erector size, anad some may have huge glutes, while others have hardly any glute development. This is because they have different structures. Special exercises can counteract this. When using the conjugate method, you must work your weaknesses first. If your traps are the weak link, work them first with pulls from boxes, snatch grip deadlift shrugs, or one-arm snatches. You will develop max force through heavy weights lifted at a slow tempo. If your pulls, good mornings, back raises, squats, etc., go up, your clean and jerk and snatch will go up as well. I have a junior (22 year old) 275 pounder who is the only junior to hold the open world record in the bench press at 728.5 pounds. He actually exceeded the 308 world record, the only man to do this. He trains the bench press with 365 for eight to ten sets of triples, barely 50% of his max. How is this possible? This is accomplished through special exercises for the bench press. The triples are done in a very explosive manner, followed by triceps, delt, and lat work. The second workout consists of rack work, floor press, or board press for a max single. We don't care how slow or hard the lifts are on this day. This is the max effort method. We don't even care if a lift is missed, because at least he is putting forth maximum effort. He will do a certain major exercise for two or three weeks and then switch. By doing this, he maintains velocity on one day and max effort on the other day 52 weeks a year. What's my point? You can do the same, by doing the multiple sets with submaximal weights and building explosive strength, and build amazing brute strength throughout the year with pulls off at least four different height boxes. Pick a certain box and max out for two or three weeks. Then switch to a different box and repeat. The pulls should be followed by some type of good morning. There should be a wide variety of exercises to choose from, and the number of exercises should be limited to four or five per workout. Don't do what you like to do; rather do what you need to do. I am amazed to hear that the squat is overrated as far as developing the Olympic lifts. Remember Paul Anderson? He was an unreal squatter. Paul was lightyears ahead of everyone in the squat, and at the same time he catapulted himself ahead of everyone on the Olympic platform. The increase in his squat paralleled his success in the Olympic lifts. After Paul visited the USSR and astounded them, they began to build squat racks. They soon realized the benefits of the squat. I hear all the time that one only has to squat with 10% more than their best clean and jerk (C&J). But why then do we hear of monster squats by the European SHWs (900 pounds and more)? Well, if my math is correct, they are doing a lot more than 10% over their C&J. The same holds true for D. Aranda of Cuba, a junior world record holder in the C&J with 402. He squats a deep 617. The 175 pound difference is well over 10%! The squat can be the equalizer for the U.S. lifters. I recall that Kurlovich said the squat had no correlation to the C&J. That may be true for him because of his particular body structure. He quite possibly is built in a way that the legs and low back work heavily in all exercises. But not everyone is in this category. It is true that the squat could increase to the point where it would not help the C&J and snatch, but remember Kurlovich? He claimed a 400 kg. squat. The ability to do 881 could have been the reserve he needed to do those massive snatches and C&J's." The U.S. lifters need to increase their squat poundages for the main purpose of increasing their absolute strength in the hips, low back, and legs. The squat should be a mojor part of training. Most of the training should be between 50 and 70%. I have a 165 pound lifter that trains with 8 to 12 sets of two reps. Short rest periods are a must (45 to 60 seconds) between sets. He trains with 405-435 and his best contest squat is 722. As you can see, he never uses more than 60%. The same is true for my 220. He never handles a weight over 500, yet made an easy 843 at the Worlds. That is also 60% for his sets of two reps. I have many examples of the 60% rule. Everyone at Westside squats one time a week, followed by a variety of low back and ab work. This is our dynamic method. We also have a maximum effort day. We manage these great poundages through a high volume of training, coupled with roughly 40 special exercises, using only two or three at a time and rotating them every two or three weeks; this is called conjugate training. If your snatch grip deadlift goes up 50 pounds along with an increase in your high pulls off boxes, your calf-ham-glute and back raises, and your squats, then your snatch is increased. You must set records in many special exercises. Pick a group of exercises that work well for you and rotate them every two or three weeks. My methods are the reverse of everyone else's. For example, if my lifter does a C&J with 402 and we are trying to compete with a lifter who is capable of 462, my training goal is to bring up the strength to that of our competitor by working towards being equal to his high pulls, squats, back raises, good mornings, etc. When we become equal to him in the special exercises, we will be equal to his 462. The U.S. lifters have the techinal skills but lack a high level of special strength, which can only be developed through special exercises. Progress in a lift does not stall; rather, a particular muscle group stalls. If our bench press stalls, we simply do more special work on the triceps, delts, upper back or lats. That is what is holding back the bench press, not the bench press itself. I would use the same systrem for the Olympic lifts. Only a few have a perfect balance of muscle groups. Everyone else needs to do a higher volume of work for certain muscle groups. I am certain you have seen lifters with tremendous traps with mediocre erectors or just the opposite. Just look at the photo in MILO, Vol. 3, No. 2, page 31, of Pisarenko doing snatch pulls off a bench. Note first his balanced physical development. Certainly some of it comes from special pulls, such as thoses in the photo. Why do some Russian lifters do snatch pulls while standing in knee-high water? These special exercises enable them to kick out butt. There is no excuse for a U.S. lifter not to be on page 31 of that issue of MILO. With a high volume of reverse hypers, belt squats, kneeling squats, and special work with chains for pulling, learning how and why box squatting should be incorporated into training, knowing what percentage and how much volume to use, doing some eccentric, isokinetic, static, and dynamic work and many special exercises, we could move up considerably in the world of weightlifting. If we are to have a chance at the world level, we must learn how to train. If there is an excuse to fall back on, it is not knowing how to train. I would like to say something about Gary Taylor. Here is an unbelievably strong man. Did you notice that he is strong in just about everything he does? I would guess that one exercise contributed to the progress of the next exercise. This is exactly what I am talking about. One needs a widee array of exercises. I am quite sure Gary could still do well in weightlifting and take his fair share of powerlifting trophies as well. Is he a throwback to lifters like Ernie Pickett, Fred Lowe, and Russell Knipp, or is he what should be the future of weightlifting? Mixing an assortment of special exercises to excel in cleaning ability and his unreal push jerk, I think he exemplifies the latter. Powerlifters sometimes will use the Olympic lifts to help their speed. It would be wise to do special exercises in slow tempo to develop max force in the Olympic lifts. Special exercises will not destroy form, but will in fact bring good form together by reinforcing the weak links. We know that there are six phases in the snatch. I find it hard to believe that each phase is equally developed in most lifters. Find the weak phase and strengthen it through special means. I find a similar problem in the squat. Most lifters base the amount of their squat poundages off their C&J. But American lifters' C&J are so weak that it holds the squat back. Push the squats along with the pulls. Don't do it the other way around. It's not the C&J that should dictate the squats and pulls, but vice versa. The number of training workouts should be between four and a maximum of eight. For now, over eight would lead to overtraining. Once the work capacities are raised, then and only then would more workouts be added. I would raise workloads by reverse hypers and belt squats. Both have rehabilitation qualities and strength building potential. Exercises like walking barbell or dumbbell lunges and static squats against a wall would also be used to raise work capacity. Hip flexor work with either hanging or lying leg raises, one-leg swings, or spread eagle sit-ups would be done. Overhead support work must be done from the front, back, and seated. Different grips would be used. Lots of work for the torso, glutes and hamstrings is needed. We need to view training tapes of the best lifters between major meets to see what made them strong. We must learn to max out on special exercises to test our strength gains. Learn the difference between a training max and a contest max. I have found success by changing routines and exercises to fit the individual lifter. The body is always changing and so must the training for constant progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted December 1, 2003 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Glimragende artikel (og jeg håber min kropsbygning overflødiggør squat ligesom Kurlovich's )..Det bliver dog nok ikke noget med 4 træninger om ugen a lá WSB, højest tre (vi kan jo som bekendt ikke leve af at styrketræne).Måske jeg kunne nøjes med to træninger (1 dynamisk og 1 tung)?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henning Friis Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Hæh, det er der såmænd ikke så meget i - hende som vandt DM i min vægtklasse, trak 40 kg :xmas: (jeg varmer op med 30). Er man blevet en præmierytter? Nej, seriøst, så troede jeg da ikke du gik rundt konkurrenceambitioner i vægtløftning, eller har du bare, ligesom jsc og mig til tider har, svært ved at holde fokus på noget bestemt i træningen og vil prøve noget nyt? :xmas: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted December 1, 2003 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Mit træningsfocus er desværre styret af den nakkeskade, som ikke slipper taget særlig hurtigt. De olympiske løft er ikke så påvirket af lammelserne, som fx bænkpres. Med den hastighed jeg heler med i øjeblikket, tager det mindst ½ år fra nu, inden jeg er nogenlunde tilbage igen <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henning Friis Posted December 1, 2003 Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Men jeg husker altså bare at du havde knæproblemer med at squatte. Om noget andet, så er den type squat man bruger i vægtløftning altså væsentlig mere belastende for knæene end alm. squat og powersquat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armoured female Posted December 1, 2003 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2003 Jeg har haft patellaseneproblemer, sikkert gr. biomekanikken i mine teknisk lousy squat. Kan jeg ikke squatte uden problemer, så lader jeg selvfølgelig være. Kan jeg heller ikke komme i bund ved træk og stød (dvs. hvis jeg må holde mig til powerversionen af de to), så holder jeg mig til powerversionen. Men jeg har heller ikke tænkt mig at gøre mig til mere porcelænsdukke end jeg er. Tingene skal have deres chance; man kommer ingen vegne hvis man ikke prøver til, vel?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts